It is had thus, demarcated the line that divides the private space of the public. While the private sphere is lcus of the violence? destruction of the food in the work; destruction of the substance in confection of what he is useful or beautiful; the proper condition of slavery? , the other (the public space) is lcus of the action, the freedom, immortality and the plurality of that they inhabit in equality foot a common world. However, the action human being possesss a imprevisibilidade character and produces, concomitantly, irreversible results in the teia of interactions human beings in the public sphere. From there the importance of the college to judge: Hannah Arendt saw in the judgment the capacity to evaluate the text and the impacts of our action in way to the plurality human being and the capacity to give certain control to it by means of the laws and, thus, to help to preserve the public sphere of the ominous effect that can acquire definitive action or speech. In short, it can be concluded, from the reflections weaveeed for Arendt, that the public life, that is, the proper world, is a place of collective construction, elaborated by means of the common sense, that also is useful to judge, to discern and to keep ethics, the moral and the law in public space e, thus, to assure its survival to the gifts and future generations.
There we have that, the old ones had the private one as space of the preservation of the species and the public as one second life, place of personal accomplishment that it made possible to perpetuate its name for the psteros. Conditional animal. As it was a touch of Midas, that everything that touches turns gold, everything that enters for the conviviality of the men if becomes condition for its existence. It does not matter what it is, the man becomes part of its creation and already it cannot more life without it, if it becomes condition for its existence.